JESUS COMING
AND
FULFILLED
PROPHECIES
By
Milt Smotherman
When I finally realized that I had repeatedly read over many scriptures without understanding them, I was amazed. I still do not know for sure why such obvious truths remained so hidden. I think it has something to do with taking for granted the prevailing understandings. We all do that, it is difficult not to. So, determined to read with more clarity, I have found this study most interesting and filled with discoveries. God's Word has always been exciting to me, but in this study, I have found heights and wonders which I have experienced only twice in all my 50 some odd years of study. I sincerely hope others will find similar exciting discoveries as they study the scriptures presented in the next few pages.
Milt Smotherman
-
-
-
-
-
-
IS GOD THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION?
Man has found everything from flying saucers to Adolph Hitler in the Old Testament prophecies. It's all there, WWI, WWII, the League of Nations, Idi Amin Dada, United Nations, Saddam Hussein, Florence Nightingail, the Little League, well maybe I exaggerate a little, but without any exaggeration the speculation runs rampant. The texts are bandied about by many, each one claiming truth, knowledge and that the end is near, far, next month or next decade. Right now the year 2000 is a popular year. Such confusion is unnecessary.
If a time limit line for the fulfillment of prophecy can be drawn from the scriptures, speculation, will be greatly reduced and definitely confined. This booklet is written to show that line can be drawn at the destruction of Jerusalem, which historically occurred in 70 AD. Jesus' promise of a then coming judgment against the Jews and Jerusalem is well documented in the Gospels. Teachings from the scriptures involving the doing away of the Law of Moses, the last days, the Jewish concept of a resurrection, and the judgment against Jerusalem are presented for your prayerful consideration.
IS THE OLD LAW STILL IN EFFECT?
Are there still some jots and tittles? -- Jesus said:
This statement by Jesus assuredly shows that Jesus came to fulfill prophecy and that the law would not pass away until he had accomplished this feat. When something is fulfilled it can then pass away or be discarded.
Other New Testament passages certainly point to the doing away of the old law. The writer of Hebrews in reference to a quotation from Jeremiah 31:31 describes the Old Covenant as ready to vanish away:
The apostle Paul says:
* Quotations are from New King James Versionand, speaking of that written and engraved on stone,
It is important to realize that at the time the preceding statements were being made the Old Law was still in place and observance of it was possible. While there was no justification by the law, and for the Christian, the effect of the sins which it described was nullified by the cross and there was no obligation to it, the old law had not vanished because all prophecy had not been fulfilled. Acts chapter 21 well bears out the old law being in place. Notice carefully:
In view of Jesus' statement, "one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled," the fulfillment of prophecy becomes very crucial to the question, "Is the old law still in effect." I believe the answer to the question to be, "No, it is not still in effect." However, we have not, as yet, demonstrated this from the scriptures.
While the reader is encouraged to read the historical records regarding the fall of Jerusalem, stress should be made that if we accept the scriptures, we will of necessity, without the historical references, reach the conclusion that the law and prophets have been fulfilled. This is true because Jesus promised that it would happen in the lifetime of his hearers.
So in New Testament times, prophecy was soon to be fulfilled, but until the fulfillment, the Law was still in place.
DON'T LEAVE YET
Many are content to wrap everything up at the cross. This, however, does not satisfy very plain teachings in the scriptures. As for myself, I know I have changed my mind about many of these things. You may ask, "What difference does it make?" It is my prayer that anyone who believes that the Old Testament prophecies and the law ended at the cross or that the complete fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies is still in the future will carefully consider the items presented in this booklet. So, please stay with me.
EMPHASIS ON FULFILLING PROPHECY
The apostles' emphasis on the fulfillment of prophecy is seen in their many quotes and references to the statements of the prophets. The statement of Peter regarding Judas emphasizes the need of fulfillment.
After Jesus' death there remained many passages to be fulfilled which, of course, can be directly associated with Him and the preaching of His gospel. Among these we find:
RESURRECTION
It is not the purpose in this section to deal with the nature of the Jewish expectation of a resurrection. A presentation and analysis of all the teachings on the subject of resurrection is beyond the scope of this booklet. It is, however, one of the areas often questioned when dealing with the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. The subject, therefore, is addressed, not from the standpoint of what all the passages might infer or mean, but with the idea of establishing that a belief and hope of a resurrection was present. If Old Testament prophecies teach a resurrection and if all "things written" were fulfilled in conjunction with the destruction of Jerusalem, then any Jewish hope of resurrection derived from the prophets was also fulfilled by or at that time.
A belief and expectation by the Jews of a resurrection, whatever the kind, should be easy to understand. Nevertheless, at least some Jews, the Saduccees, did not believe in a resurrection. Jesus statement to them is certainly convincing as he reminds them of God's words:
Daniel was told to rest until the time he would arise.
Job's expectation is certainly worth noting:
Ezekiel speaks of a resurrection:
Martha reflected Jewish teaching when she anticipated a resurrection. In Jesus' response to her, He proclaimed that He was the resurrection.
We will mention a few scriptures regarding resurrection to illustrate that the fulfilling of resurrection prophecy should not be difficult to accept..
At Jesus Death many graves were opened.
Baptism is a type of resurrection.
Paul certainly expected a resurrection as a part of believing the law and the prophets.
See also Colossians 2:12-13.
ARE WE TO LISTEN TO JESUS, NOT THE PROPHETS?
If we are to listen to Jesus and not the prophets then prophecy must be fulfilled, if not then we should still listen to the prophets.
On the mount of transfiguration, as recorded in Matthew chapter 17, Moses and Elijah appeared and were talking with Jesus. Peter wanted to build three tabernacles, one for Jesus, one for Moses and one for Elijah but:
Peter, James and John saw Jesus only. They were to listen to Him. The Hebrew audience, living in the last days were likewise to listen to Jesus. Jesus was the one all the prophets spoke about. Peter, addressing the household of Cornelius declared:
From Matthew to Revelation the gospel record shows prophecies being fulfilled in that age and time. If the prophecies have not been fulfilled then we should still be listening to the prophets and looking for the things about which they prophesied to take place.
Have you noticed how many times the prophets are referenced by Paul and the other writers? It must be remembered that the Old Testament record was the Bible they had. The New Testament writers showed Jesus' fulfillment of scripture. Whether it was Matthew, Mark, Luke, or someone else, their written accounts told about Jesus and Jesus' actions, deeds, and words fulfilled prophecy. The dialogue between Paul and Agrippa illustrates the prophetic message in the gospel of Christ.
Abraham's statement to the rich man also bears this out.
In what sense then do we listen to Jesus and not the prophets? Understand the message -- Since Jesus came to fulfill prophecy the prophetical teachings would have no effect past Jesus. If Jesus is shown to be the fulfillment of the old testament scriptures, as Paul and the apostles have shown, then it is easy to see that those scriptures are no longer authoritative beyond their fulfillment by Jesus. We do listen to the prophets because they prove Jesus is the Messiah. The Word which became flesh fulfilled the prophecies which were yet unfulfilled when he came. We do not listen to them to find further fulfillment.
GATHERING ALL THINGS IN CHRIST IN THE FULLNESS OF THE TIMES
The expression fullness of time/times is not found in the Old Testament, at least I haven't find it; however, in the book of Daniel we do find time of the end and appointed time. In Daniel 8:13-17, Daniel is told:
and
The phrase "latter days" is found a few times including twice in Daniel. Peter's quotation of Joel 2:28 uses the term "last days" instead of "afterward." All of these Old Testament phrases imply a time of termination. Jesus came in the last days of the times when the Jews were God's chosen people. "But wait! Wait a minute," you say. "Last days refers to the entire Christian Dispensation, the times now as well as those times then are all the last days."
I must admit that I believed and taught that for years. At least two problems exist with that thinking. First, where are the scriptures which prove that is the case? The phrase certainly must be considered in context each of the 5 or so time it is used. Acts 2:17 and Hebrews 1:2 seem to be the most significant in this regard. Consider Peter's quotation in Acts chapter 2. He quoted Old Testament prophecy which was looking forward to afterward as the last days. So the question is asked, "last days of what?" In Hebrews notice "God in time past spoke to the fathers...hath in these last days"-- now once again the question is asked, "last days of what?" The second problem occurs when we answer the question, "last days of what?" with "the last days of this world". Two thousand years really stretches last days into a long period of time. I know, "a year is as a day, and a day is as a thousand years." (II Peter 3:8) We cannot, however, abuse the scripture so that time references have no meaning. If "last days" has no reference, why use the phrase? Peter could quote Joel as "and it shall be in the time when we lose reference to time."
Consider the following.
SOME WHO HEARD JESUS WOULD SEE A GREAT JUDGMENT
John the baptist testified of what Jesus was to do.
"And even now the ax is laid to the root of the trees. Therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. "I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. "His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire." -- Matthew 3:10-12
Who did Jesus baptize with the Holy Spirit? Who did he baptize with fire? In the listening audience of John, according to this text, there were some to be baptized with the Holy Spirit and some to be baptized with fire. The fire is associated with the burning of the chaff in verse 12. Verse 10 is also in the context of the passage. John says,
Those to be baptized with fire were among the same "you" as those to be baptized with the Holy Spirit. Is it not, therefore, a distortion of the text to have Jesus baptizing with the Holy Spirit then and with fire at some time beyond where we are now?
JUDGMENT PASSAGES
Many have trouble with the judgment passages of the Old Testament prophets and consequently have difficulty understanding the judgment against Jerusalem as prophesied by Jesus in the gospel records.
Notice the language against Babylon which was overrun by Cyrus about 536 BC.
Notice the wrath against Edom.
Prophetic language is very descriptive, The picture drawn seems to be from the perspective of the persons involved. Their world would be destroyed along with their ruling powers. Notice some judgment passages from the New Testament.
Did you carefully notice the highlighted text? The passage from Matthew 23 clearly shows the plan to send out the apostles who, teaching Jesus, will be beaten and persecuted. That is exactly what happened as the gospel was preached. The Jewish leaders and teachers were hostile and aggressive.
They had built their own house and defied even the Son of God to take it away from them. When Jerusalem was destroyed, that house was destroyed. The temple and Jerusalem were the essence of the Jewish religion as God's chosen people. When the Jews were in captivity in strange lands or later as citizens of distant lands, they prayed facing the temple. Tithes went to Jerusalem. Many went to Jerusalem every year for the Passover and Pentecost feasts. Jewish records and offices were all at Jerusalem. When Jerusalem fell, many died in the great slaughter, others were taken captive, still others, who escaped or who were not in Jerusalem had nothing left for their heartless religious worship. It was just as Jesus had quoted from the prophets, "Their heart is far from me." The great tribulation came upon those vain worshipers who crucified God's Son and killed and beat the messengers which the Son sent into all the world to preach salvation for all mankind.
In the passage from Luke notice: the passage is associated in verse 20 with the destruction of Jerusalem; this is for the fulfillment of "all things which are written" (Verse 22); and what was spoken of would take place in that generation (verse 32). Matthew, chapter 24, is a parallel passage and has somewhat the same elements. Matthew refers to: the "abomination of desolation" spoken of by Daniel (verse 15), tribulation which had never been seen before (verse 21), and the coming of Jesus in judgment (verses 29-31). Matthew also places the events as taking place in that generation. We will notice just one more passage of scripture regarding judgment.
Jesus could not come in his kingdom until his kingdom was established. Many want to make this passage referring to the establishment of Jesus' church in Acts 2, but in Acts 2 the kingdom is beginning and the structure grew throughout the pages of the Acts and the epistles. See Ephesians 2:19-22. Therefore this passage in Matthew refers to a time after Acts 2 when Jesus came in their lifetime.
JESUS CAME IN JUDGMENT AGAINST JERUSALEM
If Jesus came to fulfill prophecy (Matt. 5:17), and if all prophecy was to be fulfilled in association with the destruction of Jerusalem(Lk. 21:20-22), then Jesus must be connected with the judgment against those of his nation who rejected Him and His messengers. All are encouraged to read the following in the entire context.
Verse 34 says:
See also Luke 21:26-27 & 32, and Mark 13:24-27 & 30.
No doubt some are saying, "wait a minute, those are end of time passages." Go back and read again Luke 21:32, Matthew 24:34, and Mark 13:30. All these verses refer to Jesus' prophecies coming to pass in that generation.
ALL UNFULFILLED OLD TESTAMENT PROPHECY WAS FULFILLED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM (70 AD)
Luke 21:22 teaches that the days of vengeance associated with the destruction of Jerusalem were to happen so that all things written might be fulfilled.. In support of this we have noted the following:
-
-
-
-
-
Your comments are welcome.
I will answer as I have time and opportunity.
Milt Smotherman
20543 Gudith
Brownstown, Michigan 48183
msmotherm@comcast.net